Get over it.

Translation =

Please let me kill unarmed pods in high sec without repercussion, as I am too scared to go into low sec or null. Plus my KB is terribad and I could use some help.

You seem to have missed the point.
He wants to shoot unarmed pods in highsec as repercussion.

Highsec dwellers everywhere should rejoice at the notion, since this brings risk to what they believe is a risk-free endeavour.

Now you only want GCC not agression flags right?

You seem to have missed the point.
He wants to shoot unarmed pods in highsec as repercussion.

Highsec dwellers everywhere should rejoice at the notion, since this brings risk to what they believe is a risk-free endeavour.

while we're throwing around really dumb ideas, how about extending the GCC and removing CONCORD entirely?

Since when CAN'T you pod someone with GCC in highesc without getting shot by CONCORD?

Little bees post in threes
Post like a tool and think it's cool

Mr Epeen

if someones flagged for criminal activity then everyone should be able to attack there ship and pod.

this should incude can flipping and stealing, would solve a lot of the whining about these losers lol

basically "i want to ***** killmails"

and we're still going to own all of you v0v

Shooting temporary-GCC'd pods would be enjoyable - but it wouldn't do much to curb suicide ganks (gankers would just go without implants).

It might cause issues in lo-sec fights where you choose to temporarily go GCC in order to engage a low-standing or neutral pilot (for NBSI RoE). Now, not only will everyone be free to shoot at you for going GCC, but they'll also be able to take shots at your pod without becoming GCC.

Could be good, could be bad.

Can't take it too literally, but you can disable a criminal's car, you can disable a criminal's mobility (ie: shot to the leg), but you can't actually kill the criminal, in most cultures/laws/etc. Not unless it's under certain circumstances, and in self defense. Pods don't have weapons, ergo... Just an example.

Those that say it won't stop the activities are right and, as such, it opens up a new type of highsec group and new options for "hiring mercs" to help protect.

shouldn't call people brainless when you can't spell meight

The new bounty sytem is situational, the hunter gets what he shoots. If the bad guy flies in a shuttle with an empty clone, shooting him will pay out almost nothing.

As a ganker, I wouldn't notice the change in mechanic. You will not catch my pod.

You've got a month to plot your revenge and catch them in something expensive. Why isn't that enough?

On the other hand, hearing the tears of those that got popped when they shot a flashy pod is quite laughable and would be sorely missed.

I never go GCC and if I did I'd be able to get my pod out so +1 because of all the newbies I'll get to pod kill because they clicked the wrong button.

Speaking as someone who loves shooting pods, I support the OP wholeheartedly.

It would make Hulkageddon so much more interesting

I'm not arguing against it, nor am I being sarcastic. I think it's a great idea because I will be able to get alot of free highsec podkills, it's just funny that this mechanic change would benefit my gameplay, hurt cute newbies and barely effect suicide gankers at all.

I'm all fot it.

I'm going to make this happen.

Death to pods!

it's an alpha thrasher: the pod should be dead as soon as you lock

why the hell do you have a warp disruptor on there

my ~wootinator mini~ podkillers have no need of such nonsense

I thought that CCP Soundwave was an audio tech hosting the alliance tournament because of CCP budget issues for the longest time.

He was responsible for Incarna?

It was clearly a question because of -> ?

Why did you answer it with an ok and then another -> ?

This makes no sense.

and if i see your pod its dead even with concord around :3:

what a pathetic carebear

'i only kill defenseless pods if i'm paid to do it'

sheesh

no wonder you insist on mining ice

of course i do

i don't go 'well killing this miner is insufficent isk per hour i guess i won't do it' i go 'hey look a mackinaw with five repping ships: time to call in a tornado and woot to high heaven when it alphas the mack'

i just want to know when in addition to jacking all of a miner's implants I made him lose sp

The victim gets a mail about what skill they lose from a t3 loss, so should include the same info on the KM

I'm going to pod your ass!

i am reliably informed your average highsec idiot considers it a 'waste of sp' since nobody pods in highsec

or they're a bot, and boy a lot of ice miners don't even notice they got blown up

i'm boring.

I know all about every fact of life, especially about future ethics.

That only works if you assume the defender in question is dumber that a Goon....

And while I admit to flying high, even i'm not spaced enough to fall for those tricks....
And I think your confused, this is not so much about protecting the miners, as it is about annoying Goons, that is the real fun in the game....